APS April Meeting 2013
Volume 58, Number 4
Saturday–Tuesday, April 13–16, 2013;
Denver, Colorado
Session T3: Invited Session: DNP Prize Session
3:30 PM–5:18 PM,
Monday, April 15, 2013
Room: Plaza E
Sponsoring
Unit:
DNP
Chair: Berndt Mueller, Duke University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2013.APR.T3.1
Abstract: T3.00001 : Bonner Prize Talk -- First Laboratory Observation of Double Beta Decay
3:30 PM–4:06 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Michael Moe
(University of California, Irvine)
Although we are awash in neutrinos, we remain ignorant of some of their
fundamental properties. We don't know their masses. We don't know whether
``anti-neutrinos'' are really distinct particles. Double beta ($\beta
\beta )$ decay offers a handle on these questions if we can observe the
energy spectrum of the two emitted electrons, and determine whether or not
they share their energy with two neutrinos. Seeing neutrinoless (0$\nu )$
decay would solve some enduring puzzles. The power of the process to
elucidate the neutrino was recognized in the 1930's, but $\beta \beta $
decay would be exceedingly rare and difficult to detect. Unsuccessful
laboratory searches had been going on for 25 years when the UC Irvine group
began its first experiment with a cloud chamber in 1972. After some
background for the non-expert, and a snapshot of the theoretical and
experimental milieu at the time, the talk will begin with the reasons for
choosing a cloud chamber, and the taming of its balky and idiosyncratic
behavior. The talk will end with the first definitive observation of
two-neutrino (2$\nu )\beta \beta $ decay of $^{\mathrm{82}}$Se in the
vastly superior time projection chamber (TPC) in 1987. Discouragement
through the tortuous 15-year interval was relieved by occasional victories.
Some I will illustrate with revealing cloud-chamber photographs. We learned
many things from this primitive device, and after seven years we isolated an
apparent $\beta \beta $ decay signal. But the efficiency of the trigger
was small, and difficult to pin down. Estimating 2.2{\%}, we were way low.
The resulting ``short'' $^{\mathrm{82}}$Se half-life of 1 x
10$^{\mathrm{19}}$ years was suspect. New technology came to the rescue with
the invention of the TPC. Experience with the cloud chamber guided our
design of a TPC specifically for $\beta \beta $ decay. The TPC was built
from scratch. Its long, steep learning curve was also punctuated with little
triumphs. A memorable moment was the first turn-on of a portion of the
chamber. So long ago, this all seems rather quaint, but through ample use of
photographs and anecdotes it makes and interesting story. As a digital
device, the TPC made data acquisition and analysis orders of magnitude
simpler and faster. After seven years of massage, the TPC yielded good
evidence for 2$\nu $ decay of $^{\mathrm{82}}$Se with a half-life near
10$^{\mathrm{20\thinspace }}$ years. While the 0$\nu $ mode was not in
evidence, finally seeing $\beta \beta $ decay in the laboratory created
optimism about an eventual 0$\nu $ discovery.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2013.APR.T3.1