APS April Meeting 2012
Volume 57, Number 3
Saturday–Tuesday, March 31–April 3 2012;
Atlanta, Georgia
Session C6: Invited Session: Goals and Assessment of the Physics Graduate Program
1:30 PM–3:18 PM,
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Room: Embassy C
Sponsoring
Units:
FEd FGSA
Chair: Juan Burciaga, Mount Holyoke College
Abstract ID: BAPS.2012.APR.C6.2
Abstract: C6.00002 : Objectives and Assessment of the NMSU Physics Ph.D. program
2:06 PM–2:42 PM
Preview Abstract
View Presentation
Abstract
Author:
Stefan Zollner
(New Mexico State University)
New Mexico State University (NMSU) in Las Cruces, NM, is accredited by the
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) and a member of the North Central
Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA). As part of our continuous
accreditation, the physics department annually assesses its progress towards
goals and objectives. Our academic goals include the development of skills
pertinent to solving advanced problems in physics, a mastery of advanced
concepts in physics, an in-depth knowledge of one or more subfields, and
develop the ability to conduct original research in a specialization. These
goals are supported by objectives, including scientific expertise, advanced
training, experimental training, communication skills, and technical
know-how. We measure one direct student learning outcome, the ability to
solve advanced problems in general physics subjects. The instrument for this
measurement is our written physics comprehensive (Ph.D. candidacy) exam,
which is administered by an examination committee consisting of all faculty
members. We report annually on the percentage of students passing the exam
in the various areas (QM, mechanics, E{\&}M, Stat. Mech.). Ineffective
preparation of our students in one area would show up by unusually low
scores in that area. Since the problems are written and graded by all
faculty (not just by those who taught the class), this provides an
independent assessment of student learning and also evidence by other
professionals skilled in the field. Our examinations are similar to
published exams at other institutions. The results of the exam provide
feedback to the course instructors, to the students, and to the department
head who schedules instructors and courses. In some cases, retaking a course
has been a condition of passing the exam for a student. (I acknowledge the
efforts of Gary Kyle, who has managed our assessment for many years, and of
the entire NMSU physics faculty for contributing to this process.)
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2012.APR.C6.2