APS April Meeting 2011
Volume 56, Number 4
Saturday–Tuesday, April 30–May 3 2011;
Anaheim, California
Session C4: Proton Charge Radius and Precision QED
1:30 PM–3:18 PM,
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Room: Garden 4
Sponsoring
Unit:
GFB
Chair: Hossein Sadeghpour, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Abstract ID: BAPS.2011.APR.C4.2
Abstract: C4.00002 : The Mainz high-precision proton form factor measurement
2:06 PM–2:42 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Jan Bernauer
(MIT)
Form factors offer a direct approach to fundamental properties of
the nucleons like the radius and charge distribution.
Renewed interest was stirred up by the 5 sigma discrepancy
between a recent determination of the proton radius from the Lamb
shift in muonic hydrogen and preceding electron scattering
results. The low-q shape of the form factors might also contain a
direct signal of a pion cloud around the nucleus and is a strong
test of hadron models.
In my talk, I will discuss the electron scattering experiment
performed with the 3-spectrometer-facility of the A1
collaboration at MAMI in Mainz, Germany. The data set covers the
$Q^2$-range from 0.004 to 1\,$(\mathrm{GeV}/c)^2$ and includes
about 1400 separate cross section measurements, spanning the
range of scattering angles from below 20$^\circ$ to above
120$^\circ$ at six beam energies between 180 and 855\,MeV, with
statistical uncertainties below 0.4\%. The 3-spectrometer-setup
allowed for a simultaneous monitoring of the luminosity and
overlapping and redundant measurements of the cross section to
achieve stringent control over systematic uncertainties. Beam
stabilization systems and redundant current measurements further
limit systematic effects.
The measured cross sections were analyzed with the standard
Rosenbluth separation technique and by employing direct fits of a
large set of form factor models. The high redundancy of the data
set allowed us to extract the form factors up to
0.6\,$(\mathrm{GeV}/c)^2$ with very small uncertainties and to
give a new, precise value for the proton radius from electron
scattering.
From the form factors, the charge distribution and Zemach moments
were calculated. The latter constitute important input for the
theoretical corrections of the muonic Lamb shift experiment.
However, the revised values can not explain the discrepancy.
Further possible explanations include higher order
QED-corrections, vacuum effects or even physics beyond the
standard model.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2011.APR.C4.2