2007 APS April Meeting
Volume 52, Number 3
Saturday–Tuesday, April 14–17, 2007;
Jacksonville, Florida
Session K5: Changing Role of Nuclear Weapons in Foreign Policy
1:15 PM–3:03 PM,
Sunday, April 15, 2007
Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront
Room: Grand 6
Sponsoring
Units:
FHP FPS
Chair: Benn H. Tannenbaum, AAAS
Abstract ID: BAPS.2007.APR.K5.2
Abstract: K5.00002 : History of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Doctrine and a Path Forward
1:51 PM–2:27 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Christopher Chyba
(Princeton University)
During the Cold War, the United States considered a number of
approaches for
living in a world with nuclear weapons, including disarmament,
preventive
war, the incorporation of nuclear weapons into military strategy,
passive
and active defense, and deterrence. With the failure of early
approaches to
disarmament, and the rejection of preventive war against the
Soviet Union
(and later, China), deterrence became central to key nuclear
relationships,
though arms control continued to play an important role. The nuclear
nonproliferation treaty made preventing the further spread of
nuclear
weapons another central component of U.S. policy.
The Bush Administration has tried to devise a new policy for the
post-Cold
War period. Their approach has three salient pillars. First, it is
characterized by an overall skepticism toward multilateral
agreements, on
the grounds that bad actors will not obey them, that agreements
can lead to
a false sense of security, and that such agreements are too often
a way for
the Lilliputians of the world to tie down Gulliver. The March
2005 U.S.
National Defense Strategy declared that U.S. strength ``will
continue to be
challenged by those who employ a strategy of the weak, using
international
fora, judicial processes and terrorism.''
Second, the Bush Administration declared its intention to maintain a
military dominance so great that other states simply would not
try to catch
up. The 2002 National Security Strategy states that ``Our forces
will be
strong enough to dissuade potential adversaries from pursuing a
military
build-up in hopes of surpassing, or equaling, the power of the
United
States.''
Third, the 2002 National Security Strategy (reaffirmed by the
2006 National
Security Strategy) moved preventive war (which the strategies called
``preemptive war'') to a central position, rather than deterrence
and
nonproliferation. In part this was because of the claim that certain
``rogue'' states, and terrorist groups, were not deterrable.
This talk will sketch this history, discuss the approach of the Bush
Administration in more detail and assess its successes and
failures, and
suggest the lines of a new approach to U.S. nuclear weapons
policy for the
coming decades. This approach will follow that outlined in George
Bunn and
Christopher Chyba (eds.), ``U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy:
Confronting Today's
Threats'' (Brookings, 2006, 340 pp.).
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2007.APR.K5.2