2007 APS April Meeting
Volume 52, Number 3
Saturday–Tuesday, April 14–17, 2007;
Jacksonville, Florida
Session B5: Energy Forum I: Fossil Fuels, Challenges and the Environment
10:45 AM–12:33 PM,
Saturday, April 14, 2007
Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront
Room: Grand 6
Sponsoring
Unit:
FPS
Chair: Lawrence M. Krauss, Case Western Reserve University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2007.APR.B5.2
Abstract: B5.00002 : Fossil Energy: Drivers and Challenges.
11:21 AM–11:57 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Julio Friedmann
(Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
Concerns about rapid economic growth, energy security, and global climate
change have created a new landscape for fossil energy exploration,
production, and utilization. Since 85{\%} of primary energy supply comes
from fossil fuels, and 85{\%} of greenhouse gas emissions come from fossil
fuel consumption, new and difficult technical and political challenges
confront commercial, governmental, and public stakeholders. As such,
concerns over climate change are explicitly weighed against security of
international and domestic energy supplies, with economic premiums paid for
either or both. Efficiency improvements, fuel conservation, and deployment
of nuclear and renewable supplies will help both concerns, but are unlikely
to offset growth in the coming decades. As such, new technologies and
undertakings must both provide high quality fossil energy with minimal
environmental impacts.
The largest and most difficult of these undertakings is carbon management,
wherein CO2 emissions are sequestered indefinitely at substantial
incremental cost. Geological formations provide both high confidence and
high capacity for CO2 storage, but present scientific and technical
challenges. Oil and gas supply can be partially sustained and replaced
through exploitation of unconventional fossil fuels such as tar-sands,
methane hydrates, coal-to-liquids, and oil shales. These fuels provide
enormous reserves that can be exploited at current costs, but generally
require substantial energy to process. In most cases, the energy return on
investment (EROI) is dropping, and unconventional fuels are generally more
carbon intensive than conventional, presenting additional carbon management
challenges. Ultimately, a large and sustained science and technology program
akin to the Apollo project will be needed to address these concerns.
Unfortunately, real funding in energy research has dropped dramatically
(75{\%}) in the past three decades, and novel designs in fission and fusion
are not likely to provide any substantial offset in the next 30 years when
they are most needed internationally.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2007.APR.B5.2