Bulletin of the American Physical Society
2008 Joint Spring Meeting of the New England Section of APS and AAPT
Volume 53, Number 4
Friday–Saturday, April 4–5, 2008; New London, Connecticut
Session F2: APS/AAPT Contributed Talks II |
Hide Abstracts |
Chair: Richard Paolino Room: Smith Hall 126 |
Saturday, April 5, 2008 8:00AM - 8:20AM |
F2.00001: Our Electron, Proton and Neutron Models Predict Atom Building from Three-ring Orthogonal Interlocks of Properly Quarked Nucleons. Roger McLeod, David McLeod We posited flatland electron loop strings from transversely vibrating neutrino strings. Loop traveling waves TWs alternately become upwardly deflecting standing waves SWs along each half-wave segment between non-vibrating node pairs. Descending SWs again revert to TWs at flatland, as far as the next two adjacent nodal pairs, where folding continues and new SWs descend, then ascend, and repetition follows. Three dimensional objects, not points, result. A broken ``linear'' electron string and its electron spring constant are compressed within stars until linear mass density is compatible with incorporation into a stable three-ring proton string. The created neutron has two down quarks and one up, but must be unstable because it lacks overpass-underpass interlocks of our proton that shared its linear charge density of two up quarks and one down quark with the electron, becoming neutral. Anu transversely aligned neutron can have one of its ``notches'' pushed into the acceptor notch of a proton, and deuterium results. Tritium may be a compatible ``catch'' of another neutron. An alpha particle follows when a second proton is forced in, creating a stable ``tic-tac-toe'' grid. Atom building proceeds routinely. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, April 5, 2008 8:20AM - 8:40AM |
F2.00002: Our Electron Model vindicates Schr\"{o}dinger's Incomplete Results and Require Restatement of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle David McLeod, Roger McLeod The electron model used in our other joint paper here requires revision of some foundational physics. That electron model followed from comparing the experimentally proved results of human vision models using spatial Fourier transformations, SFTs, of pincushion and Hermann grids. Visual systems detect ``negative'' electric field values for darker so-called ``illusory'' diagonals that are physical consequences of the lens SFT of the Hermann grid, distinguishing this from light ``illusory'' diagonals. This indicates that oppositely directed vectors of the separate illusions are discretely observable, constituting another foundational fault in quantum mechanics, QM. The SFT of human vision is merely the scaled SFT of QM. Reciprocal space results of wavelength and momentum mimic reciprocal relationships between space variable $x$ and spatial frequency variable $p$, by the experiment mentioned. Nobel laureate physicist von B\'{e}k\'{e}sey, physiology of hearing, 1961, performed pressure input Rect $x$ inputs that the brain always reports as truncated Sinc $p$, showing again that the brain is an adjunct built by sight, preserves sign sense of EMF vectors, and is hard wired as an inverse SFT. These require vindication of Schr\"{o}dinger's actual, but incomplete, wave model of the electron as having physical extent over the wave, and question Heisenberg's uncertainty proposal. [Preview Abstract] |
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700