2006 APS March Meeting 
Monday–Friday, March 13–17, 2006;
Baltimore, MD
Session P7: Focus Session: Physics of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks
11:15 AM–2:15 PM, 
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Baltimore Convention Center 
Room: 307
Sponsoring
Units: 
GSNP DBP
Chair: Joshua Socolar, Duke University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2006.MAR.P7.4
Abstract: P7.00004 : Gene expression dynamics during cell differentiation: Cell fates as attractors and cell fate decisions as bifurcations*
1:03 PM–1:39 PM
Preview Abstract
  
 Abstract
  Abstract   
Author:
Sui Huang
(Harvard Medical School)
During development of multicellular organisms, multipotent stem 
and 
progenitor cells undergo a series of hierarchically organized 
``somatic 
speciation'' processes consisting of binary branching events to 
achieve the 
diversity of discretely distinct differentiated cell types in 
the body. 
Current paradigms of genetic regulation of development do not 
explain this 
discreteness, nor the time-irreversibility of differentiation. 
Each cell 
contains the same genome with the same $N (\sim $ 25,000) genes 
and each cell 
type $k$ is characterized by a distinct stable gene activation 
pattern, 
expressed as the cell state vector $S_{k}(t)$ = {\{}$x_{k1}(t)
$,.. 
$x_{ki}(t)$,.. $x_{kN}(t)${\}}, where $x_{ki}$ is the 
activation state of gene $i$ in 
cell type $k$. Because genes are engaged in a network of mutual 
regulatory 
interactions, the movement of $S_{k}(t)$ in the $N$-dimensional 
state space is 
highly constrained and the organism can only realize a tiny 
fraction of all 
possible configurations $S_{k}$. Then, the trajectories of $S_
{k}$ reflect the 
diversifying developmental paths and the mature cell types are 
high-dimensional attractor states. Experimental results based 
on gene 
expression profile measurements during blood cell 
differentiation using DNA 
microarrays are presented that support the old idea that cell 
types are 
attractors. This basic notion is extended to treat binary fate 
decisions as 
bifurcations in the dynamics of networks circuits. 
Specifically, during cell 
fate decision, the metastable progenitor attractor is 
destabilized, poising 
the cell on a `watershed state' so that it can stochastically 
or in response 
to deterministic perturbations enter either one of two 
alternative fates. 
Overall, the model and supporting experimental data provide an 
overarching 
conceptual framework that helps explain how the specifics of 
gene network 
architecture produces discreteness and robustness of cell 
types, allows for 
both stochastic and deterministic cell fate decision and 
ensures 
directionality of organismal development.
*This work has been supported by the USAF/AFOSR
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2006.MAR.P7.4