Bulletin of the American Physical Society
59th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 62, Number 12
Monday–Friday, October 23–27, 2017; Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Session TI3: Stability, Scenarios, and MHD
9:30 AM–12:30 PM,
Thursday, October 26, 2017
Chair: Fatima Ebrahimi, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Abstract ID: BAPS.2017.DPP.TI3.1
Abstract: TI3.00001 : Predict-first experimental analysis using automated and integrated MHD modeling*
9:30 AM–10:00 AM
Preview Abstract Abstract
Brendan C. Lyons
(General Atomics, Oak Ridge Associated Universities)
The success of ITER and future fusion reactors would benefit significantly from theoretical predictions of stability and performance that have been validated against contemporary tokamaks. We present results of a predict-first analysis of transient-stability experiments using OMFIT [Meneghini, Nucl. Fusion 2015] integrated-modeling workflows. In particular, we look at the effect of shape variation on plasma response to 3D magnetic perturbations in order to predict access to ELM suppression. Beginning from equilibrium reconstructions of past experiments, we use EFIT [Lao, Nucl. Fusion 1985] to modify the shape of equilibria while other plasma parameters (e.g., beta, pedestal density) are held constant. Additional complexity in the workflows are considered, including using EPED [Snyder, Nucl. Fusion 2011] and NEO [Belli, PPCF 2012] to create pedestals with self-consistent pressure and bootstrap current profiles. We then use the autoC1 script, developed to automate linear M3D-C1 [Jardin, Comput. Sci. Discovery 2012] extended-MHD simulations, to assess the plasma response of each predicted equilibrium as though it is a reconstruction of a future experiment. Results from these workflows are used to guide subsequent experiments on DIII-D and KSTAR, and are then validated against 3D magnetics and ELM-suppression observations from the completed experiments. The validation is then used to develop workflows that would have more accurately predicted the experiment. In doing so, the physics models and ELM-suppression metrics considered are improved with every iteration of prediction and experiment. Lessons learned for best practices in predict-first studies and plans for future areas of application (e.g., disruption avoidance) are discussed.
*Supported by the US DOE under DE-FG02-95ER54309, DE-FC02-06ER54873, DE-FC02-04ER54698, & DE-SC0015499, and South Korea NFRI.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2017.DPP.TI3.1
The American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics.
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
Editorial Office 1 Research Road, Ridge, NY 11961-2701 (631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs 529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001 (202) 662-8700